의료과오의 판례 분석
Malpractice Case Law Analysis
김선영, 서미현, 신상철, 빙정호, 박정훈, 이경은, 민샘, 최지혜, 박문선, 김진,
소속 상세정보
김선영 ( Kim Seon-Young ) - 건양대학교병원 치과학교실
서미현 ( Seo Mi-Hyun ) - 건양대학교병원 치과학교실
신상철 ( Shin Shang-Cheul ) - 건양대학교병원 치과학교실
빙정호 ( Bing Jung-Ho ) - 건양대학교병원 치과학교실
박정훈 ( Bak Joung-Hun ) - 법무법인 우성
이경은 ( Lee Kyung-Eun ) - 가톨릭대학교 치과학교실 보철과
민샘 ( MIn Sam ) - 가톨릭대학교 치과학교실 교정과
최지혜 ( Choi Ji-Hye ) - 가톨릭대학교 마취통증의학과
박문선 ( Park Moon-Sun ) - 을지대학교병원 신경외과
김진 ( Kim Jin ) - 가톨릭대학교 치과학교실 구강악안면외과
KMID : 1146620140030010009
Abstract
This is intended to give dentist the guideline of avoiding dental malpractice suit and getting some reasonable solutions in the suit. This paper analyzes the law provisions that are applied to medical malpractice litigations and the trend of rulings in such litigations. As the analysis of trend shows, the Korea Supreme Court recognizes that it is so hard for patients to provide evidence in the litigations. And it emphasizes that doctors should fulfill their professional commitment and explain the method and result of treatment as well as the prognoses and sequelae of disease in detail. As a result, it can significantly reduce the risk of litigation when dentists treat patients more carefully and give detailed explanations to patients. Most of the medical suits occur when doctor are unfaithful to their patients and patients are not able to control their emotions. Therefore, dentists had better try to answer all the questions from patients and understand their emotions with sincerity. In addition, it is recommended that dentists should be advised by lawyers and be positive and cooperative with the court’s meditating efforts, when involved in such litigations.
키워드
Malpractice; Litigation; Court; Explanation
원문 및 링크아웃 정보
등재저널 정보